• One volunteer, 35 nest boxes

    By Ilana DeBare

    Golden Gate Bird Alliance has many wonderful volunteers — sharp-eyed field trip leaders, personable docents, folks who assist with the unglamorous but essential work of maintaining our office files and member database.

    But every so often we get a volunteer who, well, stands out from the flock.

    Like Kathleen Curry – who recently built THIRTY-FIVE nest boxes for us from scratch!

    Kathleen had building skills from her career as a general contractor. She had a garage filled with tools. She had a lifelong love of birds.

    So when Volunteer Coordinator Noreen Weeden put out a request for help building nest boxes to sell as a fundraiser for GGBA, Kathleen answered the call.

    In spades!

    Kathleen collected scrap wood and perused a variety of nest box building plans to ensure that the end-result would be usable and healthy for birds. (Nest boxes need to have ventilation, the holes need to be the right size for the desired species, etc.)

    Barn Owl box / Photo by Ilana DeBare

    Then — together with volunteers Ken Bernicker and Michael Noel — she culled out any rotten or splintered wood, cut boards, sanded them, tacked the pieces together with nontoxic waterproof glue and a nail gun, secured the boxes with weatherproof screws, and waterproofed the rooves. Each box required several hours of work.

    The result was a truck-full of nest boxes of varying sizes — small ones for titmice and chickadees, midsize for Western Bluebirds and Tree Swallows, humongous ones for Barn Owls.

    We sold a bunch of the boxes at the Kensington farmer’s market this weekend. But more are available in our office: Come by during a weekday afternoon or call us at (510) 843-2222 if you’d like to buy one.

    Kathleen unloads some nest boxes / Photo by Ilana DeBare

    This was Kathleen’s first serious effort at building nest boxes. She had made bird houses with her kids when they were little — but that was quite a while ago.

    Since then, her kids grew up (she now has six grandchildren!) and she became a birder.

    Kathleen plunged in by taking our Birds of the Bay Area class about five years ago. “I had always been interested in birds, but until then, I’d been working so hard that I never had time to learn about them,” she said.

    A Berkeley resident, Kathleen purchased a nest box for her own yard about four years ago.…

  • Brown Pelicans at Alameda Point

    We at Golden Gate Bird Alliance have spent a lot of time advocating for the endangered California Least Terns at Alameda Point. But there are about 180 other species of birds that call Alameda home too — including Brown Pelicans. We’d like to share some wonderful photos and information about the pelicans by Alameda resident Richard Bangert, reprinted from his Alameda Point Environmental Report blog.

    ———————–

    By Richard Bangert

    The successful recovery effort for the once endangered California Brown Pelican is evident every summer through fall on Breakwater Island, an area which forms the beginning of the Alameda Point Channel leading to the ship docks and Seaplane Lagoon.  The breakwater is a wall of boulders built up from the Bay floor to reduce wave action in the harbor.

    L-shaped Breakwater Island, largest Brown Pelican roosting site in San Francisco Bay. The former Naval Air Station is to the right. / Photo by Richard Bangert

    California Brown Pelicans were listed as an endangered species in 1970.  The pesticide DDT was identified as the cause of their decline.  It caused reproductive harm, and altered the birds’ calcium absorption, which led to thin eggshells that would break under the parents’ weight.  Use of DDT was banned in the United States in 1972.

    A recovery effort was launched in the 1970s on Channel Islands National Park off the coast of Santa Barbara. The only breeding colonies of California Brown Pelicans in the western United States are within Channel Islands National Park on West Anacapa and Santa Barbara islands.

    Brown Pelicans relaxing on Breakwater Island on a sunny fall day. Their mouth sack is the largest of any bird and is used to scoop fish when they plunge into the water. / Photo by Richard Bangert

    In the summer and fall, the Brown Pelicans can range from nesting colonies in Mexico and the Channel Islands all the way up to British Columbia.  Alameda Point’s Breakwater Island is the largest roosting site in San Francisco Bay. A safe, secure roosting area is essential for pelicans to rest, preen, dry their feathers, maintain body temperature, and socialize.

    When the Naval Air Station was still active, the Navy enforced restrictions against boats landing on the Island and posted signs that warn against disturbing the birds.  Since the base closed, there has been no one to enforce regulations against disturbing the pelicans.

    The California Brown Pelican was removed from the Endangered Species List in 2009 after an almost 40-year recovery. …

  • Winners/losers in Oakland’s Christmas Bird Count

    By Bob Lewis

    This year will be the 113th year of Christmas Bird Counts in North America.  Golden Gate Bird Alliance sponsors two counts in our region, centered in San Francisco and Oakland.  Although Christmas counts are great fun and an opportunity to meet other birders, see a variety of birds and get a good understanding of what birds are available in our area, they also have a more serious side.

    The National Audubon Society has made the results of all counts available to everyone at www.audubon.org/bird/cbc/hr/index.html. This Citizen Science data is used by environmentalists and ornithologists to understand population changes, and consider actions that might help to minimize the loss of endangered species.

    Recently I took a look at data from the Oakland Count to see what it might say.

    For a variety of reasons, it was easy for me to look at the data from 1974 to 2011.  This is a 38-year period.  I divided it in half, and compared the years 1974-1993 with 1994-2011.  Over this period, the population of Alameda County increased over 40 percent.  Another development that potentially affected bird populations was the Oakland Hills fire in 1991, just before the beginning of the second period.

    I averaged the count data over each period, and applied some statistical tests to the results.  Here’s what I found, for the top 20 increases and decreases:

    Birds with increasing populations

    Birds with decreasing populations

    Species

    % incr.

    Avg(1)

    Species

    % decr.

    Avg(2)

    Common Raven

    1258

    146

    White-winged Scoter

    95

    199

    Red-shouldered Hawk

    978

    29

    Bonaparte’s Gull

    94

    164

    Pygmy Nuthatch

    362

    95

    Northern Pintail

    90

    1599

    American Crow

    302

    386

    Red Knot

    88

    117

    Common Merganser

    276

    87

    Horned Lark

    87

    45

    Hairy Woodpecker

    222

    23

    Pine Siskin

    84

    891

    Black Phoebe

    177

    186

    Ruddy Turnstone

    77

    22

    Townsend’s Warbler

    171

    125

    California Quail

    77

    432

    Greater Yellowlegs

    158

    60

    Glaucous-winged Gull

    76

    1386

    Black-necked Stilt

    121

    162

    Loggerhead Shrike

    75

    26

    Wood Duck

    116

    17

    Brandt’s Cormorant

    74

    107

    Cinnamon Teal

    110

    40

    Red-throated Loon

    72

    44

    Marsh Wren

    99

    10

    American Pipit

    68

    196

    Acorn Woodpecker

    97

    39

    Canvasback

    65

    1356

    Nuttall’s Woodpecker

    85

    88

    European Starling

    64

    6154

    Rock Pigeon

    78

    2124

    Wilson’s Snipe

    63

    33

    Gadwall

    76

    152

    Wrentit

    60

    445

    Bufflehead

    65

    2093

    Brewer’s Blackbird

    60

    1805

    Brown Creeper

    55

    74

    Burrowing Owl

    58

    10

    Turkey Vulture

    37

    183

    Red-breasted Merganser

    57

    90

     
    (1)   This is the average number of birds seen per year during the second period, 1994-2011.
  • Moving forward with the Alameda Wildlife Refuge

    By Mike Lynes

    Federal and local government agencies have been moving forward in recent months with plans to transfer part of the former Alameda Naval Air Station to the Department of Veterans Affairs for construction of V.A. facilities on the site. In August, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services issued a Biological Opinion that would allow the project to proceed, but that warned the transfer will make life more difficult for the endangered California Least Terns that nest on the airstrip at the former base.

    Under the new plan, the V.A. medical clinic will not be located directly on the tarmac area used by the terns, which Golden Gate Bird Alliance has long fought to have recognized as an official wildlife refuge. Instead, it will be built to the north of the tarmac, on a parcel known as the Northwest Territories. The V.A. columbarium will be built on a small portion of the tarmac near the clinic and will host burial and memorial activities. Several hundred people will visit the VA facilities each day.

    The FWS found that the project will increase disturbance and predation pressures on the California Least Terns and will potentially reduce or degrade their foraging habitat.  To offset those impacts, the VA will be required to carefully monitor the terns, reduce predators, and minimize disturbances.

    Least Tern with prey / Photo by Bob Lewis

    While aspects of the project remain worrisome, the current plans are an improvement over past designs to construct the entire complex on the refuge. Moreover, the Biological Opinion further restricts development on the Northwest Territories and other properties adjacent to the terns’ habitat in order to minimize the cumulative impacts of light, noise and predators over time.

    The Alameda Wildlife Refuge is so important because it is home to one of the most thriving colonies of endangered California Least Terns and provides habitat for more than 180 other species of birds. The colony has consistently produced more young terns than colonies three to five times its size in Southern California, where predation and disturbance pressures hinder management.  The success of the Alameda colony is essential for the species’ survival and recovery.

    Golden Gate Bird Alliance and others are particularly concerned about the management of wetlands and other habitats at Alameda Point.  These habitats draw predators away from the tern colony—which stands alone on an empty tarmac that dissuades predators. If those habitats are compromised, predators may hunt more intensely within the California Least Tern colony. …

  • Poems about ravens and crows

    By Phila Rogers

    When eighty California poets come together to create an anthology about crows and ravens, you know these corvids have a strong grip on the human imagination.

    The anthology A Bird Black as the Sun: California Poets on Crows & Ravens was produced by two Santa Barbara poets, Enid Osborn and Cynthia Anderson, and published earlier this year by Green Poet Press.

    The Press is affiliated with Green Poet Project, founded by Osborn in 1999 to promote poetry events and publications in the Santa Barbara area.

     

    The title is taken from Gary Snyder’s Myths and Texts:

    “Raven
    on a roost of furs
    No bird in a bird-book
    Black as the sun”
     
     

    This wonderful collection is divided into ten sections beginning with Awakener and ending with Night-Bringer.  The titles evoke certain aspects of “crowness” such as “Enigma,” “Muse,” “Omen,” “Joker” and “Messenger.”

    I had not intended to read every poem, but ended up doing so.  Not every poem resonated with my corvid sensibilities, but most did.

    Jim Natal’s poem “Early Morning Crow,” states that “Crows have no shame.  They caw at 6 A.M., expect a response from windows reflecting overcast skies….” and then ends with “a solitary crow that croaks:  Is anybody there?  Is anybody there?  Then flies away before you can form a suitable answer.”

    Osborn, one of the co-editors of the collection, says that “what sets crows and ravens apart from other birds is their ability to individuate and surprise.”  She adds that “The same is true of the poets who fill these pages.”

    Like all good poems, this collection inspires you to dig deep for your own crow thoughts.  For instance, deborah major writes in her “San Francisco Crows:”

    When I was a child
    There were no crows
    in San Francisco
    no wild crows
    sleek, black and full
    of harsh, assaulting song.

    Those lines prompted me to remember that when I heard the raucous, impertinent Common Raven’s call for the first time a few years ago, I thought it gave a nice, unexpected wildness to the Berkeley hill where I live.  Then, as their numbers increased and they took up surveillance positions on the tops of the tallest conifers, I worried whether they were looking for songbird nests to raid.  And as ravens and crows became more abundant everywhere, I wondered why.

    I especially appreciated the poems in the section titled “Joker.” W.K. Gourley speaks through a crow in his poem “Crow Advises Claude, the Bird Hunter,” saying:

    Claude, you have a faulty view of my kin,
    Our Corvus family is not responsible
    For foot-tracks around your eyes
    Or measuring a straight flying distance.