By Bruce Mast

I checked my carbon footprint last night. Why, you might ask? Well, it was either that or step on the bathroom scale. Both have about the same effect—vaguely unpleasant but much-needed reminders about how my choices impact either my health or the planet’s health. The science around my personal choices still seems murky—count calories or just carbs? More exercise? More protein? Good cholesterol? My head spins. But despite what a few naysayers would have us think, the basic science underpinning climate change is straightforward. When we burn fossil fuels for energy, we add more and more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. This buildup acts like a blanket that traps heat around the world, which disrupts the climate. Heat buildup drives ever more frequent and extreme weather events. The hots get hotter, the colds get colder, the wets get wetter, the drys get drier, and storms pack a more powerful punch.

Of course, climate change affects humans in numerous (mostly negative) ways, but birding has further attuned me to how it stresses my feathered friends. If it wasn’t already hard enough being a bird in the face of habitat loss, outdoor cats, light pollution, and on and on, now birds must cope with the increasing prevalence of extreme heat waves, drought, wildfires, and shifting seasons that disrupt essential food sources. I derive great joy from birds and nature, and I want my nieces, nephews, and their children to enjoy the same experiences. So it’s painful to watch bird numbers decline year after year, knowing that my carbon emissions contribute to the problem.

Compared to my personal health, my choices influencing my carbon footprint are more complicated because I reject the notion that I should make heroic sacrifices to save the planet. The problem is simply too big for a handful of altruists to solve on their own. The solution requires all of us and . Only when planet-saving choices align well with individual self-interests can we expect people to adopt those choices on a mass scale.

On the other hand, I can’t just point my finger at “those other people” who need to change their ways—Big oil! China! Big Coal!—again, the solution requires all of us. I can get on my soapbox about how “the government” should take action to bring climate-friendly choices within reach, but when our elected leaders take action to do so, then it’s up to us (and me!)…

By Sierra Glassman and Emily Banno

We’ve lost 70% of seabirds worldwide over the last 70 years. Our warming climate pushes the forage fish that seabirds eat deeper and further offshore, and overfishing puts additional pressure on these important food resources. Loss of shoreline habitats leaves coastal communities vulnerable to floods and deprives seabirds of crucial nesting areas. As aspiring ornithologists passionate about conserving both our birds and communities, we were eager to sign up for Save the Seabirds Fly-in, an opportunity for Audubon on Campus students to speak with lawmakers in support of federal protections for forage fish and investment in natural infrastructure.

On October 16, 2023, we landed at Reagan National Airport after a collective six hours of sleep. After depositing our carry-ons in our rooms, we went off to explore the Smithsonian Natural History Museum. We were particularly drawn to the “Birds of D.C.” display, its taxidermied Passenger Pigeon and Carolina Parakeet — a grim reminder of what we were trying to prevent. We returned to the hotel to join up with the rest of the cohort for dinner at the Lauriol Plaza. Gustavo Figueroa, the Student Outreach Associate for the National Audubon Society’s Audubon on Campus Program, greeted and introduced us. In total, over twenty campuses were represented by almost thirty students from across the country.

The next morning, we attended training at the Audubon office to prepare for our congressional meetings. We were grouped with Sonia Stan and Estephania Quintana, fellow California representatives who started the University of California, San Diego chapter. Jesse Walls, an Audubon lobbyist, was our mentor. He taught us how to speak to the representatives as constituents and helped us practice our personal connections to seabirds and natural infrastructure. After a bento box lunch, we nervously Uber-ed to Capitol Hill.

Senior Director of Government Affairs at NAS, Jesse Walls, and Campus Chapter members speak to Hon. Brad Sherman’s (D-CA) Legislative Aid, Emma Silver (bottom right), during the National Audubon Society Seabird Fly-In on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Tuesday, October 17, 2023. The Seabird Fly-In is held to build grassroots pressure on Congressional decision makers to take the declining seabird population crisis seriously. Credit: Sydney Walsh

The meetings were less formal than we expected. Jesse amicably chatted with each staffer about the current shutdown before we got into each of our stories. The staffers seemed sympathetic to the issue and close to our age, making it easier to connect with them.…

By David Assmann

Despite rainy weather, a record 190 participants joined the San Francisco Christmas Bird Count, an increase of 68 over last year. It was our highest number ever, and included 25 beginning birders. Fortunately, despite a forecast of rain all day, the rain held off until early afternoon giving dry conditions for most of the morning. However, the boat survey was done the day before the Count, due to the forecast weather conditions. 

By the time Count Week (CW) was over, the species tally was at 191, tying the previous record set in 2019. For the official Count Day, our species total was 178, the same as last year. Our total count of birds for the Count Day was 61,671 – up 3,500 from last year but below our numbers from 2020 and 2021. However, if you add the 7,620 birds counted on the boat the day before, our numbers are comparable to 2020 and 2021.

Sage Thrasher by Adam Winer

There were 47 rare or uncommon birds found on this year’s count, with 34 of these found on Count Day. For the first time ever, we recorded Elegant Tern on Count Day. It was the only new species added to the Count. We did have a number of species that had only been seen once before, including Winter Wren (first seen in 2022), Gray Catbird (2013), Sage Thrasher (2022), Northern Parula (2005), White-winged Dove (2021) and Magnolia Warbler (2004). One Count Week bird – Black-headed Grosbeak – was also seen for only the second time. 

Overall duck numbers were about the same this year as last year, although we missed a number of uncommon species – Harlequin Duck, Barrow’s Goldeneye, Eurasian Wigeon, Common Merganser and Cinnamon Teal. Seen on Count Week were Wood Duck, Redhead, White-winged Scoter and Long-tailed Duck. 

Surf Scoter numbers were up somewhat from last year at 703, but still well below historic levels. In 1985 the count for Surf Scoters was 13,600 and as recently as 2015, the count totaled more than 3,000. 194 Northern Shoveler were reported – a fraction of numbers in previous years – there were 7,268 reported in 2000.  Greater Scaup numbers are also down significantly – 662 were recorded, well below our high of 8,004 in 1986.  Lesser Scaup numbers are down as well – from 2,663 in 1985 to 30 this year. On a more positive note, last year only 1 Northern Pintail was seen – this year we had an unexpected offshore flight of 564, setting a new record. …

By Mick Griffin

The year was 2019, the first and only time I had been in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. My primary reason for being there was to see the Snowy Owl, a most beautiful creature, evolutionarily adapted and designed to survive in the Arctic climate. The only way for this particular San Francisco Bay area resident to see a Snowy Owl was to fly north to Calgary in the darkest depth of the Canadian winter. Was I crazy to do this at a time when Canadians  were flying south to Mexico for a few months to escape the bitter cold and short days?

Snowy Owl by Mick Griffin

As any fellow birder will appreciate, birding or a desire to see a particular species is an inexplicable obsession where logic fails to apply.

So yes, I booked the shortest, most direct flight possible (United Airlines, San Francisco to Calgary,  approx 2 hrs & 45 minutes), and I was on my way to Calgary.

I had very limited time to spend in Calgary, so before I left I found a local bird guide, environmental biologist Dan Arndt, who grew up in the area and compiled wildlife field studies for the Alberta Provincial government and companies applying for mineral, gas, oil exploration permits in Alberta. He knew the area, terrain, wildlife and in particular, the avian population like the back of his hand. He also turned out to be an incredibly amiable companion and enthusiast  of outdoor life in general.

Dan met me at my hotel in minus 10 degrees celsius temperatures at 7am on our first day together, and, in a nutshell my trip initially was a success. It took a couple of hours but we found and photographed many Snowy Owls together. There are many, many miles of flat agricultural roads around Calgary that we scoured, but there they were, either sitting on the flat snowy Tundra or perched higher up on the ubiquitous telephone poles and wires. But hold on… where was the Great Grey Owl! We hadn’t seen a single one. The Great Grey Owl had not been my target species but I had assumed it would be a formality to see at least two or three individuals. I was only with Dan for two days, with half of arrival day and half of departure day on my own scouring the more local city parks, lakes and rivers for species such as Bohemian Waxwing, Black-capped, Boreal and Mountain Chickadees, Canada Jay, Bald Eagles and Rough-legged Hawks.…