A setback and new opportunity for Mount Sutro
By Pat Greene
In April 2014, I wrote a post for the Golden Gate Bird Alliance blog, “Sutro Forest – Conservation Gem or Lost Opportunity,” about my experience birding the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Mount Sutro Open Space Reserve. This was my “patch” for the 2013 GGBA Master Birder Class at the California Academy of Sciences.
It soon became clear that “Lost Opportunity” was the relevant phrase in that title. UCSF had been poised to begin an ambitious management project that was the culmination of years of planning, with multiple community meetings and opportunities for comment. But when the comprehensive, massive Draft Environmental Impact Report was presented in 2013, there was organized, unified opposition to performing any management actions within the open space. Management would have included thinning densely overcrowded stands of eucalyptus trees and improving the understory for enhanced habitat value.
The opposition included local neighborhood groups who were strongly opposed to removal of any trees for any reason. It also included more powerful non-neighborhood East Bay organizations that threatened a lawsuit supporting the stance of the local groups. Community support for the general plan had been broad, but it was fragmented on details, and it was neither organized nor vocal at this meeting since the community had long been active contributors to the University’s plan. No revised EIR was ever produced. UCSF had more pressing priorities.
Bare crowns in stand of dead or dying eucalyptus on the East Ridge across from UCSF student housing / Photo by Craig Dawson
Cross-section of diseased tree / Photo by Craig Dawson
During the last few years, the drought has taken a terrible toll on trees and wild life on Mount Sutro. Fewer birds are heard singing in the spring. Trees have become vulnerable to pests and large stands of trees have died, resulting in hazardous conditions along public trails. Because of elevated fire risk during the drought, UCSF was required to create defensible space around structures and along roads for fire fighting. Together these factors forced UCSF to cut many trees and clear understory. This reactive felling of trees is not a management plan, but the bright spot is that the resulting openings in the forest have provided opportunities for the Sutro Stewards to establish trailside conservation sites using native plants grown in their own nursery from local cuttings and seeds.
Finally, in December 2015, UCSF announced that they would try again to formulate a management plan.…