Audubon California is supporting Proposition 1, the $7 billion state water bond that will be on the California ballot in November. Here are the reasons, summed up by Mike Lynes, Policy Director for Audubon California and former Executive Director of Golden Gate Bird Alliance.

Why Audubon California supports Proposition 1 (and you should, too)

Even before California entered its third straight year of this brutal drought, California birds were suffering from poor water management and infrastructure.

• Central Valley refuges, the last strongholds of wetland habitat in the valley, were not getting the water promised to them by Congress in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act.
• Funding has decreased for the types of habitat restoration and wildlife conservation benefitting birds that have been provided by a series of parks and conservation bonds.
• The state’s system for water delivery (including levees) is inadequate and crumbling. This puts habitat at risk, just as it threatens every other sector of the state.

California’s $7.12 billion water bond (Prop. 1) contains numerous benefits for birds and habitat throughout California.

• Explicitly allocates $475 million in funding for priority bird habitat in the Salton Sea, Klamath, and Central Valley refuges (funding for Central Valley Project Improvement Act refuge water).
• Includes almost an additional $1 billion for watershed protection, restoration, and habitat improvements.
• Includes funding for all of the conservancies throughout the state and the Wildlife Conservation Board — the principal land acquisition and restoration sponsors in the state.
• Makes critical investments in Delta habitat, through the Department of Fish and Wildlife and Delta Conservancy, which will greatly benefit birds, and ensures that bond funds cannot be spent on projects such as tunnels or canals described in the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan.
• Provides critical statewide watershed conservation funding in an environment where funds for conservation are diminishing.
• Will improve water quality and make supply more reliable – which is critically important for the environment and for birds.

With 170 California birds specifically threatened by global warming, the water bond provides critical funding for projects that will help our birds adapt to a warmer climate.

Snow Geese (mostly) at the Merced National Wildlife Refuge / Photo by Ilana DeBare

Like many conservation groups, we are concerned about the $2.7 billion set aside for water storage, including potential new dams. However:

• None of the funds are earmarked for specific projects and the funds can be spent on projects such as off-stream reservoirs and groundwater storage, which are much more environmentally sound and fiscally viable than new dams.

By Ilana DeBare

Do you recall the furor that erupted last spring when the City of Berkeley announced plans to exterminate thousands of ground squirrels at Cesar Chavez Park?

The Regional Water Quality Control Board had told the city to reduce the ground squirrel population due to concerns that squirrel burrows could allow contaminants from the landfill under the park to leach into the Bay.

But the plan would have been a disaster not just for the squirrels but for the park’s small winter population of Burrowing Owls, which rely on squirrel burrows for shelter. Over 80,000 people sent emails of protest to the city.

Golden Gate Bird Alliance’s East Bay Conservation Committee sprang into action. Together with other wildlife advocates including WildCare and In Defense of Animals, GGBA volunteers worked with city officials over a four-month period to come up with a humane alternative to the killings.

And this week marks the start of that new approach — one based on public education rather than mass extermination.

The new approach aims to reduce the park’s large squirrel population naturally, by discouraging people from feeding the squirrels. Among the initiatives:

• A new city law, passed in July and taking effect on October 1, that criminalizes the feeding of wildlife in city parks. Violators will face minimum fines of $100 after the initial “warning” period and up to $500 for multiple infractions within a year.
• New signage that will warn people not to feed wildlife.
• Brochures that explain why feeding squirrels may seem kind but is ultimately harmful. Wild animals that come to rely on human handouts risk malnutrition, spread of disease, and loss of fear of humans.

Without human handouts, the Cesar Chavez ground squirrel population will gradually disperse and decline. And there is plenty of time for this  to happen. In the wake of last spring’s outcry, city officials determined that there is in fact no evidence of squirrel burrows currently causing toxics to leach into the bay. If it is a potential problem at all, it is a problem in the future — so there is time to reduce the squirrel population naturally.

In a joint press release this week, GGBA, WildCare and In Defense of Animals praised Berkeley for moving away from its original lethal plan.…

By Cindy Margulis

I absolutely love the energy associated with massive numbers of birds ingathering — especially at dusk.   So I was treated to a particularly breathtaking marvel on September 19 as migrating Vaux Swifts swirled in the sky above the historic smokestacks at McNear’s Brick & Block in San Rafael.

As these astonishingly fast and acrobatic flyers awaited their moment to enter the roost, the sky was graced with a massive spiraling ribbon of birds. Breathtaking!

Adding to my own enthusiasm that evening was the fact that our own Rusty Scalf was there leading the counting of the swifts and attempting to detect – via radio telemetry – any of the six Vaux outfitted in Washington State with transmitters for their arduous autumnal migration down the Pacific Coast.

Rusty had discovered this Vaux roost for the birding community in 2010, when it occurred to him that the site’s dynamics matched those of other major collective migratory roost sites along the Pacific Flyway. This year Rusty marshaled several of GGBA’s dedicated volunteers — including participants in our Master Birder class — to help with the count.

It wasn’t easy to count them all, as the swifts kept arriving by the hundreds, even while an intrepid American Kestrel tried his best to pick one out of the crowd with no success. The kestrel astonished us all as he dove into a smokestack, either hoping to catch a swift inside or seeking refuge from the ones that had mobbed him when he brazenly chose to perch on the edge of their favorite chimney.

There were so many swifts that evening that some had to seek roosting spots in the other smokestacks. Our keen-eyed volunteers were watching for that, and started clicking away on their counters, their thumbs getting quite a workout, as swifts were diving down into the chimneys at almost ten birds per second.

Years ago, Vaux would seek roosts in large redwood snags but now they’ve adapted to use older brick chimneys, which give them a surface they can cling to for the night. Vaux don’t have feet for perching, just for clinging. (Think crampons like those used by mountaineers.) By gathering together in tight quarters, they not only escape the wind but conserve heat energy, especially important on a long migration through uncertain weather conditions.…

By Ilana DeBare

As wildlife lovers, as Bay Area residents, as supporters of Golden Gate Bird Alliance, we already know that climate change means trouble for birds.

But as of this week, we suddenly know a lot more about how bad that trouble will be — and which species will be at greatest peril.

National Audubon Society just released a report on North American birds and climate change that reaches the mind-boggling conclusion that nearly HALF the bird species of North America are at risk.

Of 588 species included in the study, 314 face a severe threat to their survival. Of those, 126 species are at risk of severe population declines by 2050, and another 188 species face the same by 2080 if climate change continues on its current path.

The list of Bay Area birds facing climate trouble includes some species like Snowy Plovers and Least Terns that are already on endangered/threatened lists for reasons such as habitat loss.

But it also includes many local species that seem common — even plentiful — today, such as American Avocets, Allen’s Hummingbirds, and Common Loons.

Bay Area species at greatest risk

Among the Bay Area species we know and love that are at most serious risk due to climate change are:

• Shorebirds. This includes local nesting species such as Black Oystercatchers and American Avocets, along with wintering species such as Marbled Godwits, Long-Billed Curlews, Short-Billed Dowitchers, and even the familiar Willet of our San Francisco Bay shoreline.
• Pelicans. Both Brown and American White Pelican populations are imperiled by climate change.
• Waterfowl. Familiar wintering ducks at risk include Barrow’s Goldeneye, Greater Scaup, Cinnamon Teal, American Wigeon, and even — amazingly — the ubiquitous Mallard, which could see its summer breeding territory shift far north.
• Grebes. Four of the five grebes that winter in our immediate area are at risk: Clarks and Western Grebes, as well as Eared and Horned Grebes.
• Raptors & Owls: American Kestrels, Golden and Bald Eagles, Swainson’s Hawks,  Northern Harriers, Short-Eared Owls, and Burrowing Owls are among the raptors at risk.
• Gulls. Our ubiquitous California and Western Gulls face trouble, as do Ring-billed Gulls.
• Passerines and hummingbirds. Our Rufous and Allen’s Hummingbirds are at serious risk, along with Vaux’s Swifts, Brown Creepers, and Pygmy Nuthatches.

And that’s just naming a few.

“The greatest threat our birds face today is global warming,” said Audubon Chief Scientist Gary Langham, who will be the guest speaker at our monthly Speaker Series on Thursday September 18 in San Francisco.…