A chance to do better by Petaluma swallows

A chance to do better by Petaluma swallows

By Ilana DeBare

There’s some potentially good news for the Cliff Swallows near the Highway 101 overpass in Petaluma: Caltrans may reevaluate the use of netting that has trapped and killed more than one hundred birds at that bridge.

Faced with an ongoing lawsuit by conservation groups including Golden Gate Bird Alliance, Caltrans in July asked for information about the netting’s impact on swallows and whether it is significant enough to require a more complete environmental assessment than was initially done.

“Caltrans now has a chance to get this project right, and should immediately supplement the environmental review so bird protection measures can be evaluated and in place before swallow nesting season,” said Veronica Bowers of Native Songbird Care and Conservation, the Sonoma County group that raised the initial alarm over the deadly netting. “Disturbing the nesting colony and killing swallows again this spring is not an option.”

The Petaluma overpass problem started last spring, when Caltrans began widening Highway 101. The overpass has long been a nesting destination for Cliff Swallows who have made the thousand-mile flight up from wintering grounds in South America.

Petaluma River bridge / Photo courtesy of Native Songbird Care & Conservation Swallows in netting / Photo by Scott Manchester, Santa Rosa Press Democrat

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act prohibits disturbance of nests. So to prevent the swallows from nesting in the construction area, Caltrans installed netting on the bridge. Exclusion of nesting birds is often standard procedure for construction projects, but the Petaluma nets were sloppily installed and turned out to be a death trap — entangling, maiming and killing scores of birds.

Despite numerous protests by wildlife lovers, Caltrans refused to remove the nets and consider alternative, safer ways to prevent the swallows from nesting there. So in May, the Animal Legal Defense Fund, Center for Biological Diversity, Madrone Audubon, Marin Audubon, GGBA and Native Songbird Care filed suit to halt the killing.

The judge turned down our initial request for an injunction to stop the project. But now nesting season is over for the year. Caltrans has a window of several months to reevaluate this ill-starred strategy and come up with a better approach.

Will they do so? We’re keeping our fingers crossed — and the legal pressure on.

“There are some common-sense solutions Caltrans should evaluate, such as scheduling bridge construction work outside of nesting season, or (safer) methods to encourage swallows to nest elsewhere during construction,” said Susan Kirks with the Madrone Audubon Society.…

Freeway Birding – SF to Seattle

Freeway Birding – SF to Seattle

By Sam Zuckerman

In the vast array of birding guides, it’s hard to stick out. Harry Fuller’s Freeway Birding: San Francisco to Seattle (Living Gold Press, 2013) distinguishes itself with a special hook. It only covers places to bird along the 800-mile Interstate 80 and I-5 corridor from San Francisco to Seattle. If a birding spot can’t be reached by taking a detour of 20 minutes or less, it’s not in the book.

Think of it as On the Road meets National Geographic Guide to Birding Hot Spots.

That’s precisely the book’s great virtue and weakness. The San Francisco-to-Seattle freeway route is certainly a rich birding area. As Fuller notes, fifteen National Wildlife Refuge units lie near the road, many of them wintering grounds for scores of migratory waterfowl species. Obviously though, some of the most spectacular birding destinations are outside the book’s geographical limit, including those along the Pacific coast and in the Sierra Nevada and Cascade Mountains.

Nisqually National Wildlife Refuge near Tacoma, Wash. / Photo by Harry Fuller Ashland, Oregon in winter / Photo by Harry Fuller

Within the limits he’s set for himself, Fuller — a former Golden Gate Bird Alliance field trip leader who now lives in Oregon — does a workmanlike job of cataloging birding sites. He provides generally accurate information about refuges and parks, including driving directions for reaching them, what facilities are on site, what habitats are there, and a few of the species that can typically be found.

For some of the more important areas, such as the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge, the descriptions are lengthy and detailed.  In addition to sites that have been formally set aside as parks and protected areas, Fuller describes opportunities for birding at a few rest stops and side roads along the freeway.

Map from Freeway Birding, showing birding spots between Red Bluff and Anderson, CA

Freeway Birding includes more than 100 maps of individual birding locales or the regions I-5 passes through. Although the book is not a field guide, it includes brief descriptions of a small number of species, including the Calliope Hummingbird, Wrentit, and Northern Spotted Owl. The book has some nice drawings, but no photos.

I have family in Seattle, and I travel there often. Generally I fly to Seattle so my I-5 birding experience has been limited to some of the California refuges north of Sacramento. I judged Freeway Birding by its descriptions of places I’m familiar with.…

Lights Out for Fall Migration

Lights Out for Fall Migration

By Ilana DeBare

It’s that time again — fall migration!

Hawks, shorebirds and songbirds are starting to filter through the Bay Area. And to keep them safe and on route, we’re asking people to join in our Lights Out for Birds fall campaign. Birds use the stars to navigate, and bright nighttime lights can disorient them, drawing them off course or into building collisions.

If you’re reading this blog, you probably know the drill by now:

  • Turn off or dim lights at night, especially in tall buildings and downtown areas.
  • If you have to work late, draw the blinds or use a desk lamp rather than overhead lights.

This season, we’re getting some fabulous cooperation from the City of San Francisco. Spearheaded by the SF Department of the Environment, a number of municipal buildings are committing to Lights Out.

City buildings at 555 Seventh Street, One South Van Ness, and 1650 and 1680 Mission Street have already implemented procedures to dim lights at night, one of many best practices that these buildings consider as certified ENERGY STAR buildings.

Similar efforts to reduce nighttime lighting by working with custodial staff are being planned for 25 and 30 Van Ness, as well as City Hall. Together these buildings account for the majority of city department headquarters, including the Office of Economic and Workforce Development, the Planning Department, the Municipal Transportation Agency, the Public Defender, and the Department of Public Works.

Meanwhile, the San Francisco Unified School District is starting to work with its custodians so that nighttime cleaning crews turn lights on only in the parts of buildings where they’re working. While occupying only one floor of their building, the Department of Environment turns off all of its lights every night in their new offices at 1455 Market Street.

And the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, whose new building at 525 Golden Gate Avenue was just accredited as LEED platinum, has a sophisticated lighting system with occupancy sensors throughout the structure.

THANK YOU to our friends at SF Department of the Environment and especially to summer intern Andrew Perry in the planning department!

Meanwhile, please help us spread the word about Lights Out. We’d like to involve more owners or managers of commercial buildings in downtown San Francisco and Oakland.

We have flyers and fact sheets that you can download and share with building managers or with work colleagues. Click here for a fact sheet or poster, or see our Lights Out web page for general information about the campaign.…

How’s your tern ID?

Here’s a chance to test your tern I.D. skills!

San Francisco photographer Lee-Hong Chang took pictures of five species of tern in the Bay Area over the past few months. Can you identify them all?

(There are more than one photo of each species. Answers at the bottom.)

Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang Photo by Lee-Hong Chang

 

Answers:

Photos 1 & 2 – California Least Terns at Hayward Regional Shoreline, June and July 2013.
Photo 3 – Forster’s Tern at Heron’s Head Park in SF, showing winter plumage with white cap.

Photo 4  – Forster’s Tern at San Leandro Marina in April 2013, highlighting its deeply forked tail and summer plumage with full black cap. The beak appears uncharacteristically black because it was covered in mud.

Photo 5  – Elegant Tern flock at Ocean Beach in San Francisco in July 2013, showing  transition in field marks going from summer to winter and the large number of birds migrating.

Photo 6 – Elegant Tern at Ocean Beach in San Francisco, July 2013.

Photo 7 – Caspian Tern at Agua Vista P{ark in San Fra ncisco, June 2013.

Photo 8 – Caspian, Elegant and Forster’s terns taken at Heron’s Head Park in San Francisco, August 2013, to show size variation in these three terns. Black Tern is smaller than Forster’s Tern, and Least Tern is smaller than Black Tern.

Photos 9 & 10 – Black Tern, taken at a salt pond near Moffett Field in Mountain View, August 2013. Two views of the same bird, a young bird with smoky black body and wings.

For more on tern ID, see Cornell’s All About Birds overview page on gulls, terns and skimmers.

———————————–

Lee-Hong Chang is an an Information Technology professional living in San Francisco, currently teaching IT courses at a university in Fremont. He started birding more than a year ago, and finds that photographing birds helps him learn bird identification. You can see more of his photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/lhchang.

SF painter wins national duck stamp contest — again!

SF painter wins national duck stamp contest — again!

By Ilana DeBare

San Francisco painter Robert Steiner has won the annual contest for the federal Duck Stamp — for the second time — with a beautiful image of a Common Goldeneye.

This means the Richmond district resident’s painting will appear on 2.1 million Duck Stamps, which are issued with hunting licenses.

Regardless of how you feel about hunting, it’s a great honor for a dedicated and talented local bird artist. The S.F. Chronicle ran a really nice profile of Steiner this weekend, and noted that he is one of only three living waterfowl artists to win the federal Duck Stamp twice. He has also won various state duck stamp competitions 83 times, more than any other artist, dead or alive.

Steiner works by photographing ducks at duck clubs near the Sutter Buttes each January, after hunting season is over. From thousands of photos, he develops hundreds of sketches and ultimately two or three paintings each year.

Common Goldeneye, 2012 Federal Duck Stamp by Robert Steiner

Chronicle reporter Sam Whiting wrote that the “painting of the goldeneye for the federal contest is a composite of five or six photographs of ducks, taking the best feature from each one…. Out of the sunlight, the head of the real bird is black. Its bright green head in the painting is a trick of iridescence, like a rainbow.”

“I’m trying to do for ducks what Vermeer did for Dutch women,” Steiner says. “You can’t win on sheer skill. Your painting really has to stand out, and the way I do that is with extreme contrast of dark and light.”

State of California 2012 Duck Stamp by Robert Steiner

If you’re not familiar with the Duck Stamp, it is a $15 stamp that is a required purchase with every federal hunting license. It has raised over $800 million since 1934 to preserve 5 million acres of waterfowl habitat  — a major source of land acquisition for many of our national wildlife refuges.

Recently some folks including bird blogger Larry Jordan and wildlife photographer Ingrid Taylar have come up with an innovative proposal for a federal Wildlife Conservation Stamp — a similar revenue stream that would appeal to birders, nature photographers, and others who value wildlife refuges for non-hunting purposes.

Wildlife stamp backers write:

“A 2013 Wildlife Society Bulletin piece states that changing demographics and cultural shifts away from hunting could result in a $14.3 million annual loss to refuges….…